Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:41:03 +0900 (JST)
From:      Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
To:        carvay@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, gabor@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: doc/es_ES.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports chapter.sgml
Message-ID:  <20081120.034103.123647643.hrs@allbsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <492456EC.1060805@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <49232B76.106@FreeBSD.org> <20081120.024358.165704999.hrs@allbsd.org> <492456EC.1060805@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Thu_Nov_20_03_41_03_2008_575)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Vicente Carrasco -Bixen- <carvay@FreeBSD.org> wrote
  in <492456EC.1060805@FreeBSD.org>:

ca> My point is: in my language (not in DocBook, in my mother thonge)
ca> using <quote> or &laquo; is simply a matter of taste in each moment. I
ca> can't figure why is so important to you. What I can tell you is that
ca> is not so important for me.

 There is a large difference between <quote> and &laquo; even if the
 rendering result is almost the same.  It is not based on my personal
 preference.  From viewpoint of SGML, using &laquo; is wrong.  If you
 need to change the quotation mark, please use more reasonable way to
 do so.

ca> But I find useful the have those two kinds of quotation marks. If I
ca> can use them, why I would use just one?

 I could not read you said the reason why you use &laquo; was you want
 to use two kinds of quotation marks, from the previous email.  I have
 no intention of denying to use two (or more) kinds of quotation marks
 but I object to convert <quote> to &laquo; for that purpose without
 compelling reason.  It is a kind of violation of separation of the
 logical structure and the rendering results, which SGML aims to.

ca> By the way,  I like bikesheds in magenta.

 This is not a bikeshed matter.

--
| Hiroki SATO

----Security_Multipart(Thu_Nov_20_03_41_03_2008_575)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAkkkXb8ACgkQTyzT2CeTzy1regCgshqc+tw6Z0Zmg6Irj8GHGpOa
5sgAoLd37SSblD8zpvez2arhXLmv8VvA
=dmwW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

----Security_Multipart(Thu_Nov_20_03_41_03_2008_575)----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081120.034103.123647643.hrs>