Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:48:20 -0400 From: parv <parv_fm@emailgroups.net> To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proper way to upgrade packaes from ports Message-ID: <20021007234820.GA78924@moo.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <20021007223945.03BFB5D04@ptavv.es.net> References: <001301c26e4f$737ba530$6501a8c0@antichrist> <20021007223945.03BFB5D04@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
in message <20021007223945.03BFB5D04@ptavv.es.net>, wrote Kevin Oberman thusly... > > The biggest down-side is the requirement that I run portsdb -Uu to > update the databases after a cvsup of the ports tree. This is a pretty > CPU intensive operation and can take a while on an older system. as i understand portsupgrade, "portsdb -U" would create the the index as if you had typed "make index" in your ports ($PORTSDIR). if you don't have the INDEX reflecting the current ports tree, things may go out of hand. such making of INDEX is part of freebsd ports (not portsupgrade). actually, after INDEX is made, "portsdb -u" finishes lighting fast ... in comparison. for me, creating the INDEX takes less time than updating it cvsup over a dialup connection. i don't have problem w/ the creation process being CPU intensive; bottleneck on my system is heavy disk activity. - parv -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021007234820.GA78924>