Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:34:33 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r312296 - in head: lib/libc/sys sys/kern sys/netinet sys/netinet6 sys/sys tools/regression/sockets/udp_pingpong tools/regression/sockets/unix_cmsg Message-ID: <CAH7qZfuu7SWG7Ff7k1BU6ChwwA4SqC%2BG%2BcTHjtjEr%2BAS_Q5p0g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20170117212713.GZ2611@FreeBSD.org> References: <201701161746.v0GHkcPX071529@repo.freebsd.org> <20170117065231.GW2611@FreeBSD.org> <CAH7qZftckckygNG3HRqikiaGds6FsOedUR7AWKGi-PJg96FQjA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH7qZftsYAoBj7gFpOMHgT9a12N1yshAGY%2BkAEkpbTks7LL29Q@mail.gmail.com> <20170117212713.GZ2611@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well as other pointed out there are some concerns with using enums from C++ and ABI prospective. So it looks to me that there is no general consensus on that direction. -Max On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:40:50AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > M> That being said, is there any other socket option value in there > M> implemented as enum? I don't see anything obvious, so that I am curious > if > M> it would stick out as an odd one in there. What do you think? > > Simply because 30 years ago the language didn't allow that, and later > additions mimiced the older sockopts. We need to break this loop :) > > -- > Totus tuus, Glebius. > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAH7qZfuu7SWG7Ff7k1BU6ChwwA4SqC%2BG%2BcTHjtjEr%2BAS_Q5p0g>