Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:54:46 -0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>, kib@freebsd.org Subject: Re: logging _rtld errors Message-ID: <CAGMYy3vbQNoiOYTRm9yqfY7WitViTo96mgU05Z=Fxk_wBfUGyg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EEF9375.1010203@sentex.net> References: <4EEF9375.1010203@sentex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> wrote: > Are there any security reasons as to why > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D142258 =C2=A0([patch] rtld(1= ): add > ability to log or print rtld errors) > > would not have been committed to the tree ? I've added kib@ to Cc list. It doesn't seem to me that this proposed change would do something with security? Personally I think the change is reasonable (but we may want printf be replaced with _rtld_error in rtld.c and use LD_UTRACE there?) Cheers, --=20 Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGMYy3vbQNoiOYTRm9yqfY7WitViTo96mgU05Z=Fxk_wBfUGyg>