Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:13:04 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Subject: Re: Can't compile without COMPAT_43 on i386 Message-ID: <62371311@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <44621CB1.9000403@rogers.com> (Mike Jakubik's message of "Wed, 10 May 2006 13:02:41 -0400") References: <4460E6D1.1030803@rogers.com> <4461807D.1040504@cs.tu-berlin.de> <20060510103918.X76011@woozle.rinet.ru> <44621CB1.9000403@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 10 May 2006 13:02:41 -0400 Mike Jakubik wrote: > Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > It seems WITHOUT_MODULES is more appropriate, as written in make.con example: > > > > # The list of modules to never build, applied *after* MODULES_OVERRIDE. > > #WITHOUT_MODULES= bktr plip > Right, but why does it just work on amd64? Maybe just because we don't have linuxolator for amd64? WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62371311>