Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:11:50 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libexecinfo? Message-ID: <20130918171150.GA68789@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <l1cm1v$7aq$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <l1cm1v$7aq$1@ger.gmane.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:57:35PM +0000, Walter Hurry wrote: > We had a recent issue with libiconv now being included in base, thus > rendering the port superfluous. > > Does a similar situation exist with libexecinfo? I don't seem to need the > port on on 10.0-ALPHA1 r255587, and htop and ruby both build quite > happily without it. The library is /usr/lib/libexecinfo.so.1. > libexecinfo in base is exactly the same as the on from ports, so it should be a change that doesn't require any manual operations. regards, Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlI53tYACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez+qgCfXJS9NdmJPHkflUKtffIvoNKJ oTgAoLxmGJU9LPzKwnMWjAxpy5B6sZTY =YxG5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130918171150.GA68789>