Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:44:32 +0200 From: Andre Albsmeier <Andre.Albsmeier@siemens.com> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do you still want CTM? Message-ID: <20090805104432.GA1670@curry.mchp.siemens.de> In-Reply-To: <200908051040.n75AdkVd063850@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <20090805000550.GE4145@pjdesk.au.alcatel-lucent.com> <200908051040.n75AdkVd063850@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 05-Aug-2009 at 12:39:46 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > >The vast majority of the effort is spent on updating cvs-cur. > > Just to be difficult, that's the branch I use - I find it most > > My personal most used in order: ports-cur, cvs-cur, src-cur It seems we have to stick with all of them. My prefs, also in order with the most important first, would be: src-X (where X are the -STABLE branches), ports-cur, src-cur -Andre > > > as well as statistics for ctm downloads via FTP. > > Difficult, likely not worth the effort: ... mirror sites. > > Cheers, > Julian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090805104432.GA1670>