Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 00:48:30 -0600 (MDT) From: John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> To: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org> Cc: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CD writers - recommendations Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009270040290.31358-100000@inconnu.isu.edu> In-Reply-To: <39D19632.524AE3A2@gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Never dealt with it, but I'm assuming that from descriptions I've heard, there's a implicit coprocessor involved--YMMV, IANAUSBU (IANA USB User...) On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Doug Barton wrote: > John Galt wrote: > > > > SCSI are better period. IDE does the processing on the main processor, > > while SCSI has its own to allow the main processor to hiccough a couple of > > times during the burn without ruining the burn (as much). > > What about USB? > > -- Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity. Who is John Galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0009270040290.31358-100000>