Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 12:04:30 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: ccsanady@nyx.pr.mcs.net (Chris Csanady) Cc: dfr@nlsystems.com, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, bde@zeta.org.au, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unloading LKMs (was Re: A Desparate Plea for Help...) Message-ID: <199704301904.MAA02543@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199704301635.LAA23173@nyx.pr.mcs.net> from "Chris Csanady" at Apr 30, 97 11:35:31 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >The important point is that there is *no difference* between the dynamic > >and statically loaded version of a driver. I can go into a > >/sys/compile/FOO directory and construct loadable modules from the same > >object files. > > How about a statically loaded version of the kernel? I mean, will it now > be nothing more than an aggregate of some modules? It would be nice if > all there were were modules, and to make yourself a kernel, you just > had to stick them together.. ELF section archiver! ELF section archiver! Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704301904.MAA02543>