Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:59:48 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> To: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> Cc: security-officer@freebsd.org, audit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: audit patches need reviewing/committing Message-ID: <93368.976874388@axl.fw.uunet.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 14 Dec 2000 19:15:11 EST." <20001214191511.Z1873@puck.firepipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 19:15:11 EST, Will Andrews wrote: > So, I guess my question is this: is auditing a priority of the SO team > at all? If so, someone should be appointed to the team that can be > relied on for proper reviews/commits & such, or someone should be picked > from the current time to perform this "duty". :-) One thing that this group has going for it is enthusiasm. The downside is that not every individual has the clue to match his or her enthusiasm. I don't see this as a problem. I would suggest that the primarily enthusiastic folks send patches to this list for comment. I think that the primarily clueful folks should, when pressed for time, limit themselves to commentary on those patches. In this way, the clue is disseminated and the primarily enthusiastic develop clue. It's an organic process, but one that I think will be very successful. It's already happening to some degree, in fact. Please don't take my comments as any kind of insult. I put myself squarely in the "mostly enthusiastic and only marginally clueful" category, so I'm certainly not "talking down" at anyone. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?93368.976874388>