Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 01:43:25 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6722@twc.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Ngie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> Subject: Re: Bug in make setting wrong MAKESYSPATH Message-ID: <68.62.09002.EB636295@dnvrco-omsmta01> References: <4E.66.25473.9D551295@dnvrco-omsmta03> <81057.1495500066@kaos.jnpr.net> <CAGHfRMCC6KzywEL==_=EoH_JxmQQu2aRsU-tag8pa5M-1UD%2Bcw@mail.gmail.com> <E3.CD.25473.3CCD3295@dnvrco-omsmta03> <95058.1495555282@kaos.jnpr.net> <BF.E8.25473.8AA45295@dnvrco-omsmta03> <24672.1495645494@kaos.jnpr.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
>From Simon J. Gerraty: > > Thomas Mueller <mueller6722@twc.com> wrote: > > For building the system, MAKESYSPATH should be $SRCDIR/share/mk , to be in sync. > > I tried "make -V MAKESYSPATH" from several SRCDIRs, and that's what happened. > Yes. If you look at share/mk/src.sys.env.mk > it detects that it was found via a .../ path, and replaces it in > MAKESYSPATH with the actual location - otherwise some makefiles break. > > So maybe I have to set MAKESYSPATH every time I am in ports, don't > > know if this would work from /etc/make.conf (need to experiment). > Probably not, because sys.mk will have already been found before that > ie. the damage may already have been done > > I wonder what would happen if there is no FreeBSD installation at all > > on partition where ports tree is located. > An error like: > make: no system rules (sys.mk). I go into /BETA1/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/synth , run env MAKESYSPATH make all-depends-list and then it seems to work correctly with no syntax error in /BETA1/usr/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk Maybe I need to file a bug. What happens if src, ports and doc trees are installed on an NFS share, where there would be no FreeBSD installation? Tomhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?68.62.09002.EB636295>