Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 23:35:06 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Viktor Dukhovni <freebsd@dukhovni.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE: Kernel panic in ipv6_output() via tcp6_usr_connect() Message-ID: <fbf5a436-bd97-ea76-8237-89079fe70d54@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <39EFBDF9-B313-4472-85CF-D2D5D508E991@dukhovni.org> References: <FCC0833F-AA88-4F27-9DA3-4FA1218C49DB@dukhovni.org> <86dcc06d-b98c-cc1f-8726-8afb011871e3@yandex.ru> <DAB7BA87-49E8-483D-8837-FA3D32711AF1@dukhovni.org> <94e12e46-f54a-ae22-3f4c-0bd9ac7e1fc9@yandex.ru> <20171106044000.GM3322@mournblade.imrryr.org> <b84d376f-ac8f-cc88-8102-3500814750ef@yandex.ru> <39EFBDF9-B313-4472-85CF-D2D5D508E991@dukhovni.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --fMedoB88Va1cgq47F3DwK4RUvFS7srmMP Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="REImR2GCFj8aG3GFivUuWeoJTklg8ujO6"; protected-headers="v1" From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Viktor Dukhovni <freebsd@dukhovni.org> Message-ID: <fbf5a436-bd97-ea76-8237-89079fe70d54@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE: Kernel panic in ipv6_output() via tcp6_usr_connect() References: <FCC0833F-AA88-4F27-9DA3-4FA1218C49DB@dukhovni.org> <86dcc06d-b98c-cc1f-8726-8afb011871e3@yandex.ru> <DAB7BA87-49E8-483D-8837-FA3D32711AF1@dukhovni.org> <94e12e46-f54a-ae22-3f4c-0bd9ac7e1fc9@yandex.ru> <20171106044000.GM3322@mournblade.imrryr.org> <b84d376f-ac8f-cc88-8102-3500814750ef@yandex.ru> <39EFBDF9-B313-4472-85CF-D2D5D508E991@dukhovni.org> In-Reply-To: <39EFBDF9-B313-4472-85CF-D2D5D508E991@dukhovni.org> --REImR2GCFj8aG3GFivUuWeoJTklg8ujO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06.11.2017 17:53, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > Would this cause the packet to be denied, or passed through without > nat? Presumably, I would then have to have "ip4" and not "ip" as > "ip6" would then be denied by the "nat" rule. Right? Yes, IPv6 packet will be dropped by nat rule. >=20 > Any comments on my message (and patch) with subject: >=20 > [Patch] The 6to4 stf0 interface flapping in/out of tentative in Free= BSD 11 >=20 > How do I get this addressed by the maintainer of stf? >=20 Your problem seems like the one described in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206231 And the proposed patch is partially like your. I think if you still have the problem you need to reopen this PR. --=20 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --REImR2GCFj8aG3GFivUuWeoJTklg8ujO6-- --fMedoB88Va1cgq47F3DwK4RUvFS7srmMP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE5lkeG0HaFRbwybwAAcXqBBDIoXoFAloAx3oACgkQAcXqBBDI oXpGpwf8CneftAEnh0ILkbpusyeDYzfmTKSnZ+oDUp0pANQ+y6bcD9nb42Xje1RY +h0EWBqQ0kHLLP/IbeTIIQR76wlN9rlJ/pCI2BHZWUUYtr/+YvO30V9WFVK6Frlz Uz/GDnKRFL3+qG79k1bBJpCq9PRvdVLmJU3S7GlMgYnesw2HMEsva4+viktEnPKe 4BfZ0NfgPEtnyKosdVATXBJELomfb80QPpKMf4hM07Dwu1yYVMd6lY1cjX/jPEnp X96B9Mlp8BYLaleEQbT55wDlTG1pE3UwFOQUEStuwlTOLPQfOP4T5QyujzpISl4x hoY063oFiuDr3wK3Nkmj7u5xT7708g== =gtLG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fMedoB88Va1cgq47F3DwK4RUvFS7srmMP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fbf5a436-bd97-ea76-8237-89079fe70d54>