Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:15:35 +0200 From: freebsd@boosten.org To: hw <hw@adminart.net> Cc: Erich Dollansky <freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com>, Paul Macdonald via freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is NFS still broken in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <F1AFB608-B023-4659-8B1E-AFA375610552@boosten.org> In-Reply-To: <87k1bmxwdc.fsf@toy.adminart.net> References: <87v9v7nru4.fsf@toy.adminart.net> <20190809084409.0dc3c669.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <87k1bmxwdc.fsf@toy.adminart.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Op 9 aug. 2019, om 16:10 heeft hw <hw@adminart.net> het volgende = geschreven: >=20 > Besides that this might contradict what has been said before, it is > definitely wrong. If you think it's not you need to show how you can > export, for example, /directory-a read-only and then /directory-b > read-write. No, it isn=E2=80=99t. Have a look at this page, and all might become clear to you: = https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-nfs.html = <https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-nfs.html>; What it means is that two directories on the same file system cannot be = exported to the same client when you specify them on two different lines = in your export file. You need to specify them on one line (again: just = in the same file system, which shouldn=E2=80=99t be a big problem when = using zfs). Peter=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F1AFB608-B023-4659-8B1E-AFA375610552>