Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:25:17 +0200 From: Gianmarco Giovannelli <gmarco@scotty.masternet.it> To: Loren James Rittle <rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc iussue or ... ? Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20030412092105.030f8410@194.184.65.7> In-Reply-To: <200304120637.h3C6bMAD023785@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030412074302.03957e48@194.184.65.7> <200304120241.h3C2fQCc061882@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12/04/2003, you wrote: >In article <5.2.0.9.2.20030412074302.03957e48@194.184.65.7> you write: > > > Yes you get exactly the same situation of me. > >Really, did you report that it was possible to compile globals.o to as >small a size as linux? Perhaps you didn't look closely enough: > >Created with g++ 3.3 (prerelease) with binutils 2.13.2.1 [on FreeBSD 4.8]: No, I mean you are like me when you get the 19M file size on this situation only :-) >Created with g++ 3.2.2 built from FreeBSD ports with FreeBSD 4.7 >system binuilts 2.12.1: > >; size lonewolf > text data bss dec hex filename >1358349 17543167 4539088 23440604 165acdc lonewolf >; ls -l lonewolf >-rwxr-xr-x 1 rittle wheel 21161728 Apr 11 20:35 lonewolf* >The only thing I will tell you definitively: the problem is fixed on >FreeBSD in the forthcoming FSF gcc 3.3 release (it may also require a >recent enough binutils). There is little to no chance of this getting >backported to the FreeBSD system compiler in FreeBSD 4. Sorry... It is enough I think :-) If it will be fixed in the upcoming gcc we'll try to use it in a near future. BTW: I am happy to have pointed out the problem ... Thanks very much for your kind reply and inputs. Best Regards, Gianmarco Giovannelli , "Unix expert since yesterday" http://www.gufi.org/~gmarco
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.2.0.9.2.20030412092105.030f8410>