Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 21:42:51 -0600 (CST) From: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com> To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Cc: julian@whistle.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: still no response Message-ID: <199611070342.VAA10194@brasil.moneng.mei.com> In-Reply-To: <199611070146.SAA09269@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Nov 6, 96 06:46:19 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I still haven't heard back from anyone regarding the > > session limit addition in inetd. > > > > does everyone think it's a boring idea? > > doesn no one dislikr it? > > should I just check it in? > > The inetd already has a session limit. It's just not per service, it's > per inetd, and it's compiled in. I thought that was a session spawning rate limit - not a session number limit. Maybe I am wrong. ... JG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611070342.VAA10194>