Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:06:46 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@chello.nl> To: Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET> Cc: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be>, FreeBSD-STABLE <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Compatibility Question Message-ID: <20000626140646.B1179@freebie.wbnet> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006260733330.2314-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca>; from matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET on Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 07:42:50AM -0400 References: <v0422080ab57cec840cc3@[195.238.1.121]> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006260733330.2314-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 07:42:50AM -0400, Matt Heckaman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Brad Knowles wrote: > > : It's been my experience that when you start talking about > : significant amounts of RAM (anything over 128-256MB), you really, > : *really*, *REALLY* want to be using ECC. > > Interesting, I've always personally thought ECC to be somewhat overrated > and certaintly overpriced. Granted I do not have that much expierence in No, it is underrated and overpriced. For real serious work that is. It obviously depends on what a memory related crash costs you.. -- Wilko Bulte http://www.freebsd.org "Do, or do not. There is no try" wilko@freebsd.org http://www.nlfug.nl Yoda - The Empire Strikes Back To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000626140646.B1179>