Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 16:26:55 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@www.hotjobs.com> To: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, support@yard.de Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD (performances) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980820162453.305G-100000@bright.fx.genx.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9808201310190.237-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
urm FreeBSD bright.x 3.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #7: Sun Aug 16 22:05:13 EST 1998 bright@bright.x:/usr/src/sys/compile/bright i386 Linux poopie 2.1.76 #8 Sun Jan 18 03:42:15 EST 1998 i686 unknown that's the kernels, btw, about your previous post, every linux user i've talked to says the NFS is userland. you are sure about it being in kernel? Alfred Perlstein - Programmer, HotJobs Inc. - www.hotjobs.com -- There are operating systems, and then there's BSD. -- http://www.freebsd.org/ On Thu, 20 Aug 1998, Alex wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 1998, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > [...] > > an even 16 seconds (linux) [Redhat 5.1] (dunno the opts) > > > > this is on the same 100mbit segment. > > i'm using NFS over TCP and linux is using UDP (i think) > > both to the same Solaris 5.6 box. > > > > the FreeBSD box is my tuning (just the mount opts listed above), the > > redhat box has also been tuned by a linux user. > > This is a poor comparison, and won't get you very far IMO. If you want to > compare Linux to FreeBSD, compare them on equal ground (i.e.: 2.0.xx to > -STABLE, and 2.[1,2].xx to -CURRENT). > > - alex > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980820162453.305G-100000>