Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:52:26 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool Message-ID: <4EF4B1CA.4080800@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <4EF4B151.4040400@missouri.edu> References: <4EF4A75C.2040609@my.gd> <4EF4B151.4040400@missouri.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 12/23/11 5:50 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 12/23/2011 10:07 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> Hey up list, >> >> >> >> Look, just a rant here. >> >> >> Who in *HELL* thought it would be a cool idea to release no less than >> FOUR security advisories today ? > > After receiving the fifth security advisory in a few moments, you will > get a Christmas message from the Security Advisory team, which will > both apologize and explain why these untimely advisories came today. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security-notifications/2011-December/thread.html > Indeed, just read the one John copied. Still sucks, but at least they're aware and apologetic about how the timing completely blows. Happy xmas.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EF4B1CA.4080800>