Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Sep 2024 15:30:45 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        python@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 281470] math/py-numpy: Update to 2.1.1
Message-ID:  <bug-281470-21822-YthQaU9X6b@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-281470-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-281470-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D281470

Charlie Li <vishwin@freebsd.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vishwin@freebsd.org
              Flags|maintainer-feedback?(python |maintainer-feedback+
                   |@FreeBSD.org)               |
             Status|New                         |Open

--- Comment #2 from Charlie Li <vishwin@freebsd.org> ---
At first I'm inclined to agree with option 1 due to the types of consumers
(ahem, academic-type software) involved, but a quick look of numpy's
development trajectory seems to suggest that only 2.x is to have serious
development support going forward so option 2 seems more reasonable. Changi=
ng
consumers that rely on 1.x to a new port directory/name, given that both the
referenced software remains the same and can co-exist, does not constitute a
POLA trigger.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-281470-21822-YthQaU9X6b>