Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 20:31:42 -0500 From: Chip Marshall <chip@setzer.chocobo.cx> To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bluetooth stack for FreeBSD (full status) Message-ID: <20020204203141.A35103@setzer.chocobo.cx> In-Reply-To: <00a201c1add7$dc2e99e0$27c8a8c0@my.domain> References: <3C5F003D.CA329159@digisle.net> <3C5F1CE4.1566F495@mindspring.com> <00a201c1add7$dc2e99e0$27c8a8c0@my.domain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On February 04, 2002, Duncan Barclay sent me the following: > .11 without .11e is worse than Bluetooth for certain data types. For > example it cannot carry isochronous data. Bluetooth was never meant > to compete with .11 and was designed for a different purpose - > mobile phones. I've always thought it was odd that so many people I talk to think Bluetooth is competeing with 802.11 stuff. From what I've seen, Bluetooth basically seems like a wireless USB. -- Chip Marshall <chip@chocobo.cx> http://www.chocobo.cx/chip/ GCM/CS d+(-) s+:++ a20>? C++ UB++++$ P+++$ L- E--- W++ N@ o K- w O M+ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP+ t+@ 5 X R@ tv+() b++>+++ DI++++ D(-) G++ e>++ h->++ r++ y- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020204203141.A35103>