Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 21:39:03 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: "Antoine Beaupre (LMC)" <Antoine.Beaupre@ericsson.ca> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, libh@FreeBSD.ORG, Richy Kim <richy@apple.com> Subject: Re: packagetool.tcl Message-ID: <20010619213903.A2873@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> In-Reply-To: <3B2FA2FB.5000809@lmc.ericsson.se>; from Antoine.Beaupre@ericsson.ca on Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:07:39PM -0400 References: <20010619115903.F65489@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <XFMail.010619110945.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20010619210041.A2304@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> <3B2FA2FB.5000809@lmc.ericsson.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Antoine Beaupre (LMC) (Antoine.Beaupre@ericsson.ca): > > Libh's format hasn't etablished yet and I wonder if it ever will. > > What do you think? I can focus on libh's current package format if > > people think it's worth it. > Well this depends really on how different the 2 (op and libh) package > formats are, I guess. They will be very equal in design but very different in implementation. > Isn't there some kind of mechanism to recognize other formats in OP itself? Not yet. > If that's the case, let's finish the current format and support it > through OP. Anyways, you're doing some pushing there. ;) Just kidding... Hmm :-) Well, the package format is almost finnished. I can do some reasonable testing and write some additional scripts, to demonstrate it. Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010619213903.A2873>