Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 13:17:51 -0400 From: Haesu <haesu@towardex.com> To: Tom <tom@light.sdf.com>, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multi-Homed Routing Message-ID: <20030902171751.GA42133@scylla.towardex.com> In-Reply-To: <20030902095643.C63339@light.sdf.com> References: <0AF1BBDF1218F14E9B4CCE414744E70F07DF30@exchange.wanglobal.net> <20030901211636.Y58733@light.sdf.com> <20030902144649.GA34440@scylla.towardex.com> <20030902095643.C63339@light.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
< snip > > > Yes, most carriers do use them. But a major carrier is not going to use > some fly-by-night route registry. In fact, several carriers operate their > own registries, and don't trust information from anywhere else. Ohhh yes, and they also mirror other IRR db's too. > > And you sure they are getting farther than that? I see only three /24s > from your AS (presumably 27552), and a /21 and a /22. www.cidr-report.org They also provide view from three different ASes. Let see how many /24's you can count. > > At least 10% of the routes in the table are unnecessary. No, you meant to say 28.8% gain by fixing deaggregates -hc -- Sincerely, Haesu C. TowardEX Technologies, Inc. WWW: http://www.towardex.com E-mail: haesu@towardex.com Cell: (978) 394-2867 > > > -hc > > > > -- > > Sincerely, > > Haesu C. > > TowardEX Technologies, Inc. > > WWW: http://www.towardex.com > > E-mail: haesu@towardex.com > > Cell: (978) 394-2867 > > > > > Tom > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030902171751.GA42133>