Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 22:27:38 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: remove debug.mpsafevfs tunable? (was Re: head panic: mutex Giant owned at /d2/emaste/svn-head/src/sys/geom/geom_dev.c:184) Message-ID: <20080703192738.GR17123@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20080703191648.GA39891@sandvine.com> References: <20080703181431.GA10858@sandvine.com> <20080703185833.GQ17123@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20080703191648.GA39891@sandvine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 03:16:48PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 09:58:33PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 02:14:31PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > > > > > > Loading configuration files. > > > panic: mutex Giant owned at /d2/emaste/svn-head/src/sys/geom/geom_dev.c:184 > > > cpuid = 0 > > > KDB: enter: panic > > > [thread pid 35 tid 100069 ] > > > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3a: movl $0,kdb_why > > > db> > > > [...] > > > > Do you have sysctl debug.mpsafevfs=0 ? > > It turns out that due to an artifact of my lab environment, the tunable > debug.mpsafevfs=0 was being set -- thanks for the suggestion! > > Since it seems the tunable doesn't work properly anymore, and probably > isn't at needed at all, should we just remove it? I would not object against it. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkhtKCoACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4hUzACgz+79b1H7LfEQpMepFdBD5oCc CO4AnAxaK/4tbXImHmNS7obYIgjmh+DM =J36i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080703192738.GR17123>