Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:34:34 -0400
From:      Bill Vermillion <bill@wjv.com>
To:        Jason Francis <jasonf@citynet.net>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Porting a new filesystem to FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <20010717093434.E82350@wjv.com>
In-Reply-To: <003001c10e33$f3e3fb50$0200000a@Neptune>; from jasonf@citynet.net on Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:14:42PM -0400
References:  <20010712225653.75AD13811@overcee.netplex.com.au> <003001c10e33$f3e3fb50$0200000a@Neptune>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:14:42PM -0400, Jason Francis thus sprach:
> Has the proposition of porting another filesystem to FreeBSD been
> considered?  Given FFS's rather dismal performance compared to other
> filesystems, it would seem like a worthwhile effort.

Others?  I've had BSD file systems performing at a minium of two
times faster than 'other' Unix file system.

Name the type of file system, and name the OS. I don't know how
many different file systems [some were no more than file handlers
and didn't deserve the name system].

At least one commercial OS I've worked with let you pick from one
of 4 file-systems, or a mix of them.  Picking the wrong file system
for a particular applicaton can make things go down hill in a
hurry.


-- 
Bill Vermillion -   bv @ wjv . com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010717093434.E82350>