Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:40:58 +0200 From: "Daniel Eriksson" <Daniel.Eriksson@computer.org> To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Upcoming 4.6.1 Message-ID: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAA/FQrCe5F%2B0%2BMoX3tTe75WAEAAAAA@computer.org> In-Reply-To: <200207092205.g69M5GfP029799@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Sure - the newest security fixes go into the release as > well, but why > > not Matt's most recent bug fixes? > > Why not include OpenSSL 0.96d, ipfw2, gcc 3.1 and while we're at it > everyone else's pet software? Where would you draw the line? IMO, > 4.6.1 s/b a point patch release. Maybe because they are not bug fixes? If we go through the trouble of releasing a new version of FreeBSD why not include a few close-to-critical bug fixes if they are trivial and known to be correct? I fail to see the logic of releasing an x.x.1 version that still has serious known problems that there are known fixes for. -- Daniel Eriksson Lurker extraordinaire To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAA/FQrCe5F%2B0%2BMoX3tTe75WAEAAAAA>