Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 14:49:16 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>, Dan Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for review: getcontext, setcontext, etc Message-ID: <3C3F6BEC.727D4C6@mindspring.com> References: <3C37E559.B011DF29@vigrid.com> <200201112141.QAA25529@devonshire.cnchost.com> <15423.27120.926839.725176@caddis.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams wrote: > That *IS* the crux of the entire discussion. Everything else is agreed > upon. > > No-one is arguing the point of what *should* be done, but whether or not > it *can* be done. If it *can* be done (the jury is still out), then > *how* is it done. Once we get past that point, we can attempt to > optimize the path so that context switches can be 'lean' or 'fat' as > necessary (w/regards to the FPU state). Yes yes yes, what Nate said. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C3F6BEC.727D4C6>