Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:16:20 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 284809] Add more flag names in db_print_sbflags Message-ID: <bug-284809-227-bhaC3I9pnW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-284809-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284809 Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |glebius@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> --- Hi! Do you use ddb(4) commands to look at the socket buffer in practice or it is just desire to make a function right as long as it exists? In my daily development in this area, I don't use it for over a decade. Today bhyve allows a gdb port and this is how I look at the debugged kernel. On a live system I would use dtrace to print desired values. I'm tending to remove uipc_debug.c entirely actually. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-284809-227-bhaC3I9pnW>