Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:04:49 +0100
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r287084 - in stable/10/usr.sbin/pw: . tests
Message-ID:  <20151203110448.GA9130@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <86fuzjhlk7.fsf@desk.des.no>
References:  <201508232142.t7NLgSXX033227@repo.freebsd.org> <867fkxcbq9.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151202215958.GD20169@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <86egf4uegi.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151203083556.GF20169@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <86lh9bubru.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151203094031.GG20169@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <86fuzjhlk7.fsf@desk.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:29:44AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > The interesting thing is the validator was there before my changes, and=
 not
> > changed at all in the process of adding validation, so depending on the=
 command
> > you were using your multibyte input for gecos may or may not have been =
rejected
> > already!
>=20
> "pw useradd" worked fine in 10.1, so what exactly changed?
>=20

some commands where calling pw_checknames, somewhere not, pw useradd was no=
t so
it din't try to validate the gecos input, others were.

Bapt

--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlZgIdAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzOKQCguCEYKslIwWS9yNv7YiENBCZc
IGMAnjaY+AJic/UDvfAB7tZBgjcNR39Z
=zaRD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151203110448.GA9130>