Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:04:49 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r287084 - in stable/10/usr.sbin/pw: . tests Message-ID: <20151203110448.GA9130@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <86fuzjhlk7.fsf@desk.des.no> References: <201508232142.t7NLgSXX033227@repo.freebsd.org> <867fkxcbq9.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151202215958.GD20169@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <86egf4uegi.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151203083556.GF20169@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <86lh9bubru.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151203094031.GG20169@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <86fuzjhlk7.fsf@desk.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:29:44AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > The interesting thing is the validator was there before my changes, and not > > changed at all in the process of adding validation, so depending on the command > > you were using your multibyte input for gecos may or may not have been rejected > > already! > > "pw useradd" worked fine in 10.1, so what exactly changed? > some commands where calling pw_checknames, somewhere not, pw useradd was not so it din't try to validate the gecos input, others were. Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlZgIdAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzOKQCguCEYKslIwWS9yNv7YiENBCZc IGMAnjaY+AJic/UDvfAB7tZBgjcNR39Z =zaRD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151203110448.GA9130>