Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 19:40:51 -0500 From: Tim Tsai <tim@futuresouth.com> To: Luis Munoz <lem@cantv.net> Cc: Bo Fussing <bmf@gateway.net.hk>, Evren Yurtesen <yurtesen@ispro.net.tr>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cisco Message-ID: <19980629194051.08954@futuresouth.com> In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980629092935.03b12830@pop.cantv.net>; from Luis Munoz on Mon, Jun 29, 1998 at 09:29:35AM -0400 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980629091443.2917C-100000@finland.ispro.net.tr> <Pine.LNX.3.96.980629145211.10591J-100000@gate.gateway.net. hk> <3.0.5.32.19980629092935.03b12830@pop.cantv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> You can use 'policy routing' on your cisco to divert web traffic to your > proxy, specially if you have little bandwidth. This also protects you from > the death of your proxy, which is another support nightmare. Hmm, how does this protect from the death of the proxy server? If you policy route port 80 traffic to the proxy sever, and the proxy server dies, what happens? I am unaware of any mechanisms to provide redundancy this way (short of something like Cisco's localdirector). Thanks, Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980629194051.08954>