Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:13:03 -0400
From:      jerrymc@msu.edu
To:        Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?
Message-ID:  <20120605151303.11596msta89hqw5b@mail.msu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CADy1Ce7MihpmMowc265%2BS_RKorMO3KEKsCgr=pdnjg2jzq-dYQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CADy1Ce7MihpmMowc265%2BS_RKorMO3KEKsCgr=pdnjg2jzq-dYQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@gmail.com>:

> UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel binaries
> http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/
>
> This would seem to make compiling from source difficult.
>

I don't see how this MS scam is even at all legal.
It is clearly restraint of trade and probably violates some other
related laws too.

////jerry

> Kurt
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120605151303.11596msta89hqw5b>