Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 20:03:11 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se> Cc: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/softupdates softdep.h ffs_softdep.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006221957160.418-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <5lwvjiqvyn.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 Jun 2000, Assar Westerlund wrote: > Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> writes: > > Does this mean we can now include softupdates in GENERIC? > > Why not, it's a standard BSD (without advertisement clause) license? > > > And further, is it practical to do this? The symlinks in sys/ufs/ffs can't be cvs-committed. However, they became bogus when sys/contrib/softupdates was committed. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0006221957160.418-100000>