Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:57:03 +0200 From: "barbara" <barbara.xxx1975@libero.it> To: "glen\.j\.barber" <glen.j.barber@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD-8 and portsnap Message-ID: <KNECB3$75DE1F07F6378897F1478DDC40BC84CA@libero.it>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Kamigishi Rei<spambox@haruhiism.net> = wrote: > > barbara wrote: > >> > >> If you remove those files and run portsnap fetch update again, you w= ill > >> find only fresh INDEX-[5-7]. > >> Maybe it's caused by the fact INDEX-8 is not built on portsnap serve= rs, > >> but I really don't know. > >> > > > > Apparently, I can confirm this. > > I use portsnap fetch extract to populate my /usr/ports tree on all my= > > systems, and on 8-CURRENT machines 8-INDEX seems missing. > > > > Out of curiosity, does 'portsnap fetch update -I' restore INDEX-8? I > am not in front of my machine to test, at the moment. > No, it doesn't. After looking at /etc/portsnap.conf, I tried adding 'INDEX INDEX-8 DESCRI= BE.8' at the end, but I', getting this message: Building new INDEX files... DESCRIBE.8 not provided by portsnap server; I= NDEX-8 not being generated. And in /var/db/portsnap/tINDEX there is no DESCRIBE.8. So maybe this DESCRIBE.8 should be created on the server and included in = the snapshot. Barbara
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?KNECB3$75DE1F07F6378897F1478DDC40BC84CA>