Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:45:54 +0100 (CET) From: Christian Kratzer <ck-lists@cksoft.de> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Import src/sys/sys/hash.h from OpenBSD/NetBSD Message-ID: <20060314184157.V10576@vesihiisi.cksoft.de> In-Reply-To: <86d5gu30qx.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <1141834577.17213.15.camel@mayday.esat.net> <440F0893.5B17D61E@freebsd.org> <1141836428.17213.24.camel@mayday.esat.net> <440F0F5F.32400100@freebsd.org> <86d5gu30qx.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> writes:
>> Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> writes:
>>> FYI (if you're not reading -ports or -net), I just sent a prototype for
>>> the openospfd port.
>> Cool, thanks! I'm happy if you maintain the port as I've never done a port
>> before.
>
> IMHO, Open{BGP,OSPF}D belong in src/contrib, not in ports/net.
please don't bloat the base system with something that can run
equally well from ports. Else other people will for example want
a full blown openldap in the base just so that we can run nsswitch-ldap.
Ports are far better at tracking and keeping up to date with fast
moving complex third party packages than base.
Greetings
Christian
--
Christian Kratzer ck@cksoft.de
CK Software GmbH http://www.cksoft.de/
Phone: +49 7452 889 135 Fax: +49 7452 889 136
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060314184157.V10576>