Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 31 Aug 2025 18:34:19 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Tomek CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info>
Cc:        "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <arch@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: old-school tty garbage collection: comcontrol
Message-ID:  <CANCZdfrKeUGBsfYJFUjgrpYNUehVzF7uK8%2BBBgueayxN3hcDGg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFYkXjk2YCdx3w3aJTw5BhybTia7Szg7DKg%2BoU-Ej2=BgbMXBw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CANCZdfpbBBEA_NvynBQGzYxAGjbTrxkhGU5x=7TuxR6XomZHxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFYkXjk2YCdx3w3aJTw5BhybTia7Szg7DKg%2BoU-Ej2=BgbMXBw@mail.gmail.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Sun, Aug 31, 2025, 6:28 PM Tomek CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 1:52 AM Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> > (..)
> > But it only leaves 'drainwait' in comcontrol(8), and that's not been
> relevant to modems since the late 90s (the ones that were trouble largely
> disappeared from service by 2005). I wonder if we might not want to just
> retire comcontrol entirely. This one feature is the sole-surviving remnant
> from the 386BSD patchkit driver that Christopher G. Demetriou wrote that
> FreeBSD 1 imported (and we reimported into FreeBSD 2).
> > Does anybody still use it? I think not.
>
> Isn't camcontrol still used by ada/cd/da/pass devices?
>

For c*A*mcontrol is yes. But I'm talking about c*O*mcontrol... I had
totally forgotten about it since I think I last used it in the 90s... and
even then it was for a custom serial device the hw engineer fixed to not
need it.

Warner

-- 
> CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
>

[-- Attachment #2 --]
<div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Aug 31, 2025, 6:28 PM Tomek CEDRO &lt;<a href="mailto:tomek@cedro.info">tomek@cedro.info</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 1:52 AM Warner Losh &lt;<a href="mailto:imp@bsdimp.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">imp@bsdimp.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; (..)<br>
&gt; But it only leaves &#39;drainwait&#39; in comcontrol(8), and that&#39;s not been relevant to modems since the late 90s (the ones that were trouble largely disappeared from service by 2005). I wonder if we might not want to just retire comcontrol entirely. This one feature is the sole-surviving remnant from the 386BSD patchkit driver that Christopher G. Demetriou wrote that FreeBSD 1 imported (and we reimported into FreeBSD 2).<br>
&gt; Does anybody still use it? I think not.<br>
<br>
Isn&#39;t camcontrol still used by ada/cd/da/pass devices?<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">For c*A*mcontrol is yes. But I&#39;m talking about c*O*mcontrol... I had totally forgotten about it since I think I last used it in the 90s... and even then it was for a custom serial device the hw engineer fixed to not need it.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Warner</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
-- <br>
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, <a href="http://www.tomek.cedro.info" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.tomek.cedro.info</a><br>;
</blockquote></div></div></div>
help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfrKeUGBsfYJFUjgrpYNUehVzF7uK8%2BBBgueayxN3hcDGg>