Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2022 15:16:19 -0700 From: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> To: "Dr. Rolf Jansen" <freebsd-rj@cyclaero.com> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Looks like the arm 20220805 snapshots are still odd, so probably kern.geom.part.mbr.enforce_chs=0 was still in use Message-ID: <2016951A-BF16-4780-85FF-0B77E91FBBD4@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <99DC4046-AB8D-4D10-9475-94A8DC89DCFA@cyclaero.com> References: <A1AA705B-531D-45A2-9A1F-89F759550D3A@yahoo.com> <EA1CDEC5-A29E-43C5-9437-050CDBEC2233@freebsd.org> <6AF28022-A8E7-46B3-B64E-99D217E9B6AC@yahoo.com> <99DC4046-AB8D-4D10-9475-94A8DC89DCFA@cyclaero.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 2022-Aug-7, at 14:51, Dr. Rolf Jansen <freebsd-rj@cyclaero.com> =
wrote:
>=20
>> Am 07.08.2022 um 16:50 schrieb Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>:
>>=20
>> On 2022-Aug-7, at 12:32, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Correct, it was set to =E2=80=9C0=E2=80=9D for these builds.
>>>=20
>>> I honestly do not have any idea where the problems you are seeing =
are creeping in.
>>>=20
>>> Should it be set back to =E2=80=9C1=E2=80=9D? I=E2=80=99m not sure =
how to proceed otherwise.
>>=20
>> My guess is that if the release/tools/arm.subr line:
>>=20
>> chroot ${CHROOTDIR} gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -a 64k =
${mddev}s2
>>=20
>> was instead (note the added -b use):
>>=20
>> chroot ${CHROOTDIR} gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -b 64k -a =
64k ${mddev}s2
>>=20
>> then the line:
>>=20
>> chroot ${CHROOTDIR} newfs -U -L rootfs /dev/${mddev}s2a
>>=20
>> would work as expected and things would still be aligned:
>> no aliasing of BSD vs. freebsd-ufs. (In part this is by
>> prior steps already having achieved alignment of BSD.)
>=20
> =46rom a strict mathematical stand point of view, -a is not necessary =
when using -b with an aligned value.
"-a" controls more than the start offset: also the size.
QUOTE
-a alignment If specified, then the gpart utility tries =
to
align start offset and partition size to be
multiple of alignment value.
END QUOTE
I expect your statement would at most apply to the start offset, not to
everything "-a" does.
> Personally I don=E2=80=99t use the -a option of gpart anymore since it =
started to do funny magics in front of face. If I remember correct, =
gpart of the FreeBSD 9.x-RELEASES was still OK (or was it 8?). Nowadays, =
I align all my storage media by employing -b with a reasonable value.
>=20
I've no clue of the specifics that you are referencing and so can not =
check.
=3D=3D=3D
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2016951A-BF16-4780-85FF-0B77E91FBBD4>