Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 13:35:04 -0400 (EDT) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: JKH Project: x86: pcb_ext Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010919133409.97053A-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010919102621.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, John Baldwin wrote: : :Each thread would need its own TSS, and to preserve existing semantics, we :would have to change the TSS of all threads for each TSS related syscall. In :light of that, I vote in favor of "no TSS's for kse processes" since TSS's are :used for very few things anyways. LDT's are another matter and can be moved :w/o a problem. Currently fixing a bug in my patch for moving ldt -> mdproc (in struct proc), when done I will let you know -- should be mid-day today. Cheers, Andrew *-------------................................................. | Andrew R. Reiter | arr@fledge.watson.org | "It requires a very unusual mind | to undertake the analysis of the obvious" -- A.N. Whitehead To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010919133409.97053A-100000>