Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Feb 2016 00:09:59 +0300
From:      Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r295136 - in head: sys/kern sys/netinet sys/sys usr.bin/netstat
Message-ID:  <20160202210958.GV37895@zxy.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <56B11323.70905@freebsd.org>
References:  <201602020557.u125vxCP084718@repo.freebsd.org> <36439709.poT7RgRunK@ralph.baldwin.cx> <56B10D67.4050602@freebsd.org> <CAGMYy3v4s-UQpO3-oq8B1V1NvzyGSmJU49zDUL9oPy21sYkWCQ@mail.gmail.com> <56B11323.70905@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 12:35:47PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> > I would second John's comment on the necessity of the change though, 
> > if one already have 32K of *backlogged* connections, it's probably not 
> > very useful to allow more coming in.  It sounds like the application 
> > itself is seriously broken, and unless expanding the field have some 
> > performance benefit, I don't think it should stay.
> 
> Imagine a hugely busy image board like 2ch.net, if there is a single 
> hiccup, it's very possible to start dropping connections.

In reality start dropping connections in any case: nobody will be
infinity wait of accept (user close browser and go away, etc).

Also, if you have more then 4K backloged connections -- you have
problem, you can't process all connections request and in next second
you will be have 8K, after next second -- 12K and etc.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160202210958.GV37895>