Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:11:58 +0000 From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fix make release for 4-STABLE Message-ID: <6.0.1.1.1.20040120090951.048628e0@imap.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <20040120084052.GB56714@FreeBSD.org.ua> References: <20040118141444.GG51708@sirius.firepipe.net> <20040118235148M.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20040119092819.GA41159@FreeBSD.org.ua> <6.0.1.1.1.20040119094517.04743ea8@imap.sfu.ca> <20040119102834.GD41159@FreeBSD.org.ua> <6.0.1.1.1.20040120013116.0481d2c8@imap.sfu.ca> <20040120084052.GB56714@FreeBSD.org.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 08:40 20/01/2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:43:42AM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: > > Isn't the port good enough? Many people seem to have an urge to > > add stuff into base, but all that does is create more work. > >I somehow don't like the idea to use ports stuff to build src/ >bits, so if we decide to switch to using it, it gets probably >contributed to src/ anyway. Release building has been using ports stuff for a long time, so I'm not sure this argument makes sense. Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.1.1.1.20040120090951.048628e0>