Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:35:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.own.mk Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.0.9999.0710151432200.53972@qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <20071012081105.C6043@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <200710120803.l9C83pLM093240@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071012081105.C6043@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> Is there any chance to get bind back w/o threading support? I guess
> the question is more to Doug than to you.
My perspective on this is that the BIND in the base should have a solid
default configuration that fits the needs of the majority of our users,
and anything else can be done with the port which has knobs for things
like threads/no threads and replacing the base install.
> Going with a port for this means supporting the ports infrastructure
> respectively an extra installation procedure. Nothing that can't be done
> just extra pain;-)
What I did when I was at Yahoo! was to create a package on a master server
and then install the package on all my clients. In fact, that's why I
developed the "replace base" code in the first place.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.0.9999.0710151432200.53972>