Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:56:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libexecinfo? Message-ID: <l1cpfu$pu6$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <l1cm1v$7aq$1@ger.gmane.org> <20130918171150.GA68789@ithaqua. etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:11:50 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:57:35PM +0000, Walter Hurry wrote: >> We had a recent issue with libiconv now being included in base, thus >> rendering the port superfluous. >> >> Does a similar situation exist with libexecinfo? I don't seem to need >> the port on on 10.0-ALPHA1 r255587, and htop and ruby both build quite >> happily without it. The library is /usr/lib/libexecinfo.so.1. >> >> > libexecinfo in base is exactly the same as the on from ports, so it > should be a change that doesn't require any manual operations. > Ah, right. Thanks. Then I can safely do as I already have; i.e. remove the libexecinfo package and recompile those affected. This on the grounds that the fewer unnecessary ports the better, imho.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l1cpfu$pu6$1>