Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 11:18:18 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@mail.cicely.de> To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: Bernd Walter <ticso@mail.cicely.de>, Leif Neland <leifn@neland.dk>, Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: named pid file in /var/run/named/pid? Message-ID: <20011005111817.G3918@cicely20.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20011004153335.J297@blossom.cjclark.org>; from cristjc@earthlink.net on Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 03:33:35PM -0700 References: <7md743mtp2.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <20011004181305.B57424-100000@arnold.neland.dk> <20011004131915.C297@blossom.cjclark.org> <20011005000302.F3918@cicely20.cicely.de> <20011004153335.J297@blossom.cjclark.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 03:33:35PM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 12:03:02AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > [snip] > > > > It is not that big of a deal to hack this support for named into the > > > rc scripts. It is a hassle when considering the "correct" way to > > > handle this to make it extensible to other daemons we may wish to run > > > in such a manner. > > > > The question is what is the correct way. > > It happens I've just been hacking around in /etc/rc where the clean-up > of /var/run is done, and someone else mentioned mtree(8) in this > thread (but in a different context). I think it would be easy enough > to run mtree(8) right after /var/run is cleaned (and long after it would > be mounted as an md(4)) to get it into good form. The problem reduces > to maintaining the map file for this purpose. It's fine for the base system but what about ports? They don't have an mtree entry but share /var/run. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011005111817.G3918>