Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 22:45:36 -0700 From: "William A. Gill" <bill@duchess.wagill.com> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: conf/1443: Possible bug in /etc/rc Message-ID: <199607300545.WAA05110@duchess.wagill.com> Resent-Message-ID: <199607300550.WAA21434@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 1443
>Category: conf
>Synopsis: Possible bug in /etc/rc
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: high
>Responsible: freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Mon Jul 29 22:50:00 PDT 1996
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: William A. Gill
>Organization:
>Release: FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE i386
>Environment:
P-75 CPU, PCI M/B, 16 MB MM, 1.6 GB EIDE HD, Mitsumi 2X CDROM,
Linksys ISA ethernet adaptor, Diamon SpeedStar video, Multitec
28.8 modem.
>Description:
The /etc/rc file contains the pattern X"NO" repeatedly. However,
there is a place where the pattern is "XNO". Is this a bug?
(I am new to FreeBSD, so not sure of the full syntax of statements
in /etc/rc). Following is the area in /etc/rc with this pattern:
# $namedflags is imported from /etc/sysconfig
if [ "X${namedflags}" != "XNO" ]; then
echo -n ' named'; named $namedflags
fi
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
Should this really be:
# $namedflags is imported from /etc/sysconfig
if [ "X${namedflags}" != X"NO" ]; then
echo -n ' named'; named $namedflags
fi
???
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607300545.WAA05110>