Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:52:12 +0000 From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> To: "Osipov, Michael" <michael.osipov@siemens.com> Cc: "freebsd-java@freebsd.org" <freebsd-java@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Needle in the haystack: same Java code on two identical machines, one passes one fails Message-ID: <B49D69D5-F3FD-4A44-A416-FADF8CF86C69@gid.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <68644224DA0DE64CA5A49838ED219A0425C0F0EA@DEFTHW99EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net> References: <68644224DA0DE64CA5A49838ED219A0425C0F0EA@DEFTHW99EJ5MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:50, Osipov, Michael <michael.osipov@siemens.com> = wrote: >=20 > Hi folks, >=20 > I am currently experiencing a stdio issue on a FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE box = at work where > another, identical box, works flawlessly as well as other test boxes = in a VM or on real > hardware from 9.3-STABLE to 11.0-STABLE. >=20 > Let's stick to the two identical boxes at work for now, both are two = identical HPE > servers (Xeon CPUs, RAM 4 GiB) running 10.3-STABLE, both base systems = are > configured the same way. Software from ports installed is slightly = different. >=20 > faulty box: > FreeBSD blnn719x.ww004.siemens.net 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 = r310805: Fri Dec 30 11:29:53 CET 2016 = root@blnn719x.ww004.siemens.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BLNN719X i386 >=20 > working box: > FreeBSD blnn714x.ww004.siemens.net 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 = r310632: Tue Dec 27 18:58:32 CET 2016 = root@blnn714x.ww004.siemens.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BLNN714X i386 = [etc] Well at a quick look, there are changes between r310632 and r310805 that = might explain what you are seeing. -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B49D69D5-F3FD-4A44-A416-FADF8CF86C69>