Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 13:08:50 +0000 From: Orion Hodson <O.Hodson@cs.ucl.ac.uk> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: cg@freebsd.org Subject: soundcard.h Message-ID: <3737.976021730@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As someone who works with sound quite a bit, its hard not to notice that soundcard.h covers several different and sometimes overlapping interfaces. I had a go at re-arranging it with an aim to clarifying what works, what's deprecated in newpcm, clarifying comments about "what does this do", and putting related items together. Cameron suggested it would be a better idea to break out the functionalities into separate include files, i.e. snd_oss.h, snd_pcm.h, snd_mixer.h, snd_sequencer.h, etc and have these included from soundcard.h. Is there any strength of feeling for or against doing this? It's completely aesthetic and very minor undertaking, but I don't mind doing if people think it'd be reasonable. - Orion To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3737.976021730>