Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:14:32 -0800 From: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> To: Panagiotis Astithas <past@ebs.gr> Cc: eclipse@freebsd.org, Bland@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fix for cairo.2 not good enough to build eclipse with gnome 2.12 Message-ID: <1131444872.69134.2.camel@server.mcneil.com> In-Reply-To: <4370771C.7040802@ebs.gr> References: <1131400315.99363.4.camel@server.mcneil.com> <437061B9.6050401@ebs.gr> <1131440739.1422.1.camel@server.mcneil.com> <4370771C.7040802@ebs.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 11:59 +0200, Panagiotis Astithas wrote: > Sean McNeil wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 10:28 +0200, Panagiotis Astithas wrote: > > > >>Sean McNeil wrote: > >> > >>>Just finished the long process of upgrading to gnome 2.12. I did it the > >>>proper way and used the script as specified in UPDATING. There was a > >>>recent attempt to fix the eclipse port by updating the Makefile to > >>>specify cairo.2, but this is not good enough. > >> > >>If you update again to the latest eclipse port you'll find it was fixed. > > > > > > No, it wasn't. Not unless you just committed a fix before you sent this > > email. Perhaps it was only fixed for the x86 interface to cairo? This > > is for amd64 that I see the problem. > > I'm not a committer :-), but bland@ committed the patch by Andreas Kohn > that was circulating these lists to fix the eclipse-cairo interaction. I > encountered similar problems like the ones you mentioned while using > eclipse/Makefile rev. 1.44, but it worked fine with rev. 1.45 and the > assorted patches in eclipse/files, of course. Then again I'm using i386, > so there may be something else wrong here. I just attempted a rebuild and confirmed that it still fails for me (Makefile rev 1.45). The incorporated patches must be specific to x86 and do not fix the issue for amd64. Sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1131444872.69134.2.camel>