Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:14:32 -0800 From: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> To: Panagiotis Astithas <past@ebs.gr> Cc: eclipse@freebsd.org, Bland@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fix for cairo.2 not good enough to build eclipse with gnome 2.12 Message-ID: <1131444872.69134.2.camel@server.mcneil.com> In-Reply-To: <4370771C.7040802@ebs.gr> References: <1131400315.99363.4.camel@server.mcneil.com> <437061B9.6050401@ebs.gr> <1131440739.1422.1.camel@server.mcneil.com> <4370771C.7040802@ebs.gr>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 11:59 +0200, Panagiotis Astithas wrote: > Sean McNeil wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 10:28 +0200, Panagiotis Astithas wrote: > > > >>Sean McNeil wrote: > >> > >>>Just finished the long process of upgrading to gnome 2.12. I did it the > >>>proper way and used the script as specified in UPDATING. There was a > >>>recent attempt to fix the eclipse port by updating the Makefile to > >>>specify cairo.2, but this is not good enough. > >> > >>If you update again to the latest eclipse port you'll find it was fixed. > > > > > > No, it wasn't. Not unless you just committed a fix before you sent this > > email. Perhaps it was only fixed for the x86 interface to cairo? This > > is for amd64 that I see the problem. > > I'm not a committer :-), but bland@ committed the patch by Andreas Kohn > that was circulating these lists to fix the eclipse-cairo interaction. I > encountered similar problems like the ones you mentioned while using > eclipse/Makefile rev. 1.44, but it worked fine with rev. 1.45 and the > assorted patches in eclipse/files, of course. Then again I'm using i386, > so there may be something else wrong here. I just attempted a rebuild and confirmed that it still fails for me (Makefile rev 1.45). The incorporated patches must be specific to x86 and do not fix the issue for amd64. Seanhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1131444872.69134.2.camel>