Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:37:24 +0300
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>
Cc:        David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/sunlabel Makefile
Message-ID:  <20030417113724.GB96808@sunbay.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030417113315.GG16563@locore.ca>
References:  <20030416114542.GC16563@locore.ca> <79915.1050501080@critter.freebsd.dk> <20030416155003.GA48632@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030416205506.GB10181@sunbay.com> <20030417113315.GG16563@locore.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 07:33:16AM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> Apparently, On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:55:06PM +0300,
> 	Ruslan Ermilov said words to the effect of;
>=20
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 08:50:03AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 03:51:20PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > > > I agree about disklabel being called bsdlabel, but I may be less
> > > > convinced about doing symlinks unless to tools have at least
> > > > remotely similar userinterface.
> > >=20
> > > I've used both disk^H^H^Hbsdlabel and sunlabel.  Their interfaces are
> > > close enough that one can handle the 'disklabel' link to them.  My ha=
nds
> > > (and I'm sure many) are trained to type "disklabel" and I'd really li=
ke
> > > to see jakes suggestion become reality.
> > >=20
> > disklabel will soon be enabled on sparc64 too, once
> > the endianness fixes are committed.  This is needed
> > to cross-release architectures that use BSD labels,
> > that is i386 and Alpha.
>=20
> I do not want the existing disklabel to be installed as disklabel on
> sparc64.  It can't be used to create disks that are bootable by the
> firmware so I think it would be astonishing to call it disklabel.
> I think it would be less astonishing to link sunlabel to disklabel
> since the interfaces are similar and that what people expect to use
> to initialize disks.
>=20
> Please do not re-enable disklabel on sparc64 unless you call it something
> else.  I'm saying this with my port master hat on.
>=20
Then the only option we have is to call disklabel "bsdlabel".
We need it to be able to work with BSD labelled disks.  You
can take the BSD labelled disk on sparc64, bswapfs(8) it,
and mount.  I want all architectures understand each other.
I'm not against disklabel be -> to sunlabel on sparc64, and
-> to bsdlabel on platforms with native BSD labels, as I
already told.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov		Sysadmin and DBA,
ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software AG,
ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251	Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age

--wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+npH0Ukv4P6juNwoRApslAJ4xz3yJMc+E17f6wFaDZaNBMHwpxQCeOyUr
mCrR1QNuKS8posMCazKO/Xg=
=vV7U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030417113724.GB96808>