Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:45:30 +0100
From:      Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
Subject:   Re: broken linuxulator in -current as of Jan 8 17:51:45 CET
Message-ID:  <200701101745.33566.tijl@ulyssis.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070110160112.GA85303@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
References:  <20070108165157.GA94941@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <200701101653.25773.tijl@ulyssis.org> <20070110160112.GA85303@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Wednesday 10 January 2007 17:01, Divacky Roman wrote:
> I discussed it with alexander today and I propose that installation
> of linux_base should set (or tell user to set) the osrelease to the
> version whicih is the given linux_base shipped with on default. 
> 
> fc4 ships with 2.6.11 kenrel and we force it to use 2.4.2 no wonder
> it doesnt work as expected

That's entirely your decision of course, I'm only a simple user, but
isn't that a bit too radical? The cause for the error was entirely
FreeBSD related (the /compat/linux trick in open() and the unfortunate
fact that FreeBSD has a librt.so.1 of its own). Otherwise fc4 works
just fine with a 2.4 kernel. Of course, if linuxulator is ready for it
then by all means.


help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701101745.33566.tijl>