Date: 19 Jul 2001 15:01:12 -0400 From: Sudish Joseph <sudish@mindspring.com> To: <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>, <kuehl@lgk.de> Subject: Re: x86 unaligned access followup. Message-ID: <yviay9pk68w7.fsf@ra.eng.mindspring.net> In-Reply-To: <20010719113955.H50024-100000@wonky.feral.com> (Matthew Jacob's message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:41:20 -0700 (PDT)") References: <XFMail.010719113326.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20010719113955.H50024-100000@wonky.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Jacob writes: > Actually, to be fair, we'd have to consider all the kernel subsystems that > have *not* in fact been tested on alpha. The dozens of warnings from NetGraph > or CODA code indicate that there might be problems there, for instance. NetGraph certainly has some 32-bit asssumptions embedded in it that actively break on an Alpha. See kern/27767. -- Sudish Joseph To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yviay9pk68w7.fsf>