Date: 10 Jun 1999 09:38:37 +0300 From: "Andrij Korud" <akorud@polynet.lviv.ua> To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: RE: P-II vs K6-2 Message-ID: <NCBBINEHHJGEONJEMFOIKEGDCGAA.akorud@polynet.lviv.ua> In-Reply-To: <199906100224.TAA05830@george.lbl.gov>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > As for your lack of luck getting Celerons to 100MHz bus speeds, > what speed > > chips have you been trying to overclock? I ask because the average > > capability of the Mendocino core (although ever changing) seems to be > > around 450-500MHz. Some are better or worse, but because of this many > > 333MHz and up Celerons won't hit 100MHz bus because their core > can't take > > it. 300A's are the natural choice, as their fixed 4.5x multiplier on a > > 100MHz bus gives a core speed that is obtainable by the > majority of chips > > (450MHz). > > Notice that ALL K6-II/III and P-II/III are at fixed bus multiplexer. > Only overclock is to over clock the bus speed. > This is true only for boxed PII. I have K6-II 200 (66x3) and on ACorp maotherboard it runs at 300 (100x3), 350 (100x3.5), and even on 400 (100x4). On all frequencies it runs very well, FreeBSD's make world runs without problem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NCBBINEHHJGEONJEMFOIKEGDCGAA.akorud>