Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 19:26:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: additional queue macro Message-ID: <200207022326.g62NQMCl093288@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207021556300.97650-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <3D222CA4.80865822@mindspring.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207021556300.97650-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:07:36 -0700 (PDT), Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> said: > I would by the way argue that the statement "The queue macros always > guaranteed that traversal was safe in the presence of deletions" to be > false. Nowhere was this guaranteed, in fact the Manual page goes to > lengths to NOT do this.. I'm fairly certain that this *was* documented somewhere, at some point in time, although I can't find it in rev. 1.1 of either the documentation or the code. Perhaps it was in a book (Stevens 2?). -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207022326.g62NQMCl093288>